聘请律师等于对抗组织？/杨涛
作者:法律资料网 时间:2024-05-29 00:22:31 浏览:8314
来源:法律资料网
下载地址: 点击此处下载
聘请律师等于对抗组织？
杨涛
聘请律师等于对抗组织，如果这话出自一个山野农夫之口，也许大家能够理解，但这居然是一个堂堂前省委书记的认识，就令人匪夷所思了。据最新出版的《嘹望东方周刊》报道，贵州前省委书记刘方仁在他的案件移送司法机关以后，以他的“政治经验”认为，如果自己聘请辩护律师，就会给组织和有关部门一个印象，以为他认罪态度不好，对抗组织。所以经权衡再三，刘始终没有聘请律师。但法庭还是为其指定了承担法律援助义务的律师，经过律师的努力、法庭上的积极辩论和辩护，以及秦城监狱毫无阻碍的会见，刘方仁才知道了法律上的一个最浅显的道理，自我辩护和聘请律师进行辩护是法定的权利，绝不会被视为对抗法庭而加重自己的处罚。
对此，刘方仁有个说法，且让我们来听听。在法庭的最后陈述阶段，刘方仁悔罪：“原来我作为一个省委书记，以为什么都懂，但通过这次法庭审理我才发现，我其实是个法盲。我现在非常懊悔，曾经作为一个省委书记，我却不懂法。在民主法治国家，省委书记不懂法，这是很大的问题。不懂法，就抓不到点子上，不仅不利于省委书记本人的工作，更不利于全省人民。” 原来，他认为自己是个法盲，所以作出聘请律师等于对抗组织这样的理解当然不足为奇。
但是，事实上他是个法盲吗？恐怕不能这样理解。据北京市第二中级人民法院审理查明，刘的主要犯罪事实是收受677万余元的贿赂。别人的东西不能乱拿，这是在幼儿园时老师就会教的一个朴素的道理，胡长清、成克杰等等贪官的案件相信刘方仁也是如雷贯耳，所以说刘方仁不知道不能收受贿赂、收受贿赂是犯罪，没有人会相信。
想必他不是不知法而是不信法、不敬畏法，不相信法律面前人人平等才是真话。身居省委书记的高位，溜须拍马的多，监督的人少，也许在他看来，法律之剑惩罚的只是那些官位比他低或倒霉的人，并不会指向他。有事例为证，刘方仁在监狱开始了真正的认真学习胡锦涛和温家宝等中央领导的讲话，特别是关于民主法制建设和依法行政的讲话认真保存下来，仔细阅读，并做了很多记号。他说“我以前看报纸，看领导人的讲话，只是把它当作官样文章在浏览，完了就完了，不会认真去想，顶多就是将其中的一些话变成自己作报告时的一些套话，但现在不同了，我认真看过之后，才真正理解了法治对于一个国家的进步有多重要。”原来，他以前并非没学过法，不知道法律，只是没想到法律的锋芒也会指向自己。
然而，他是虽知法但又事实上并没有深刻领悟和感受法的精髓，并不真正懂法。从这一角度上讲，刘方仁的确是个法盲。还是从聘请律师的话题说吧，他当然知道法律赋予了他聘请律师的权利，但他并不清楚，法律之所以要赋予犯罪嫌疑人、被告人聘请律师的权利是因为法律要实现公平与正义，聘请律师才能是让犯罪嫌疑人、被告人更能充分有效地为自己辩护，而这种有效的辩护更能有利于澄清事实，保护人权，也是充分尊重他们的人格，给予表达意见的正当程序。因而，任何聘请律师为自己进行辩护犯罪嫌疑人、被告人都不可能被法庭从重或加重处罚。但是，说到这，我不禁为贵州省的父老乡亲感到后怕，有这么一个把聘请律师等于对抗组织的省委书记，当年他们万一有什么冤屈，还能有效为自己辩护吗？
不过，我更担心的是不知现在还有多少貌是知法却不信法、不敬畏且又不懂法的领导还堂而皇之坐在台上，决定着我们的命运。
通联：江西省赣州市人民检察院 杨涛 华东政法学院法律硕士 邮编：３４１０００
tao1991@163.net
tao9928@tom.com
杨涛
聘请律师等于对抗组织，如果这话出自一个山野农夫之口，也许大家能够理解，但这居然是一个堂堂前省委书记的认识，就令人匪夷所思了。据最新出版的《嘹望东方周刊》报道，贵州前省委书记刘方仁在他的案件移送司法机关以后，以他的“政治经验”认为，如果自己聘请辩护律师，就会给组织和有关部门一个印象，以为他认罪态度不好，对抗组织。所以经权衡再三，刘始终没有聘请律师。但法庭还是为其指定了承担法律援助义务的律师，经过律师的努力、法庭上的积极辩论和辩护，以及秦城监狱毫无阻碍的会见，刘方仁才知道了法律上的一个最浅显的道理，自我辩护和聘请律师进行辩护是法定的权利，绝不会被视为对抗法庭而加重自己的处罚。
对此，刘方仁有个说法，且让我们来听听。在法庭的最后陈述阶段，刘方仁悔罪：“原来我作为一个省委书记，以为什么都懂，但通过这次法庭审理我才发现，我其实是个法盲。我现在非常懊悔，曾经作为一个省委书记，我却不懂法。在民主法治国家，省委书记不懂法，这是很大的问题。不懂法，就抓不到点子上，不仅不利于省委书记本人的工作，更不利于全省人民。” 原来，他认为自己是个法盲，所以作出聘请律师等于对抗组织这样的理解当然不足为奇。
但是，事实上他是个法盲吗？恐怕不能这样理解。据北京市第二中级人民法院审理查明，刘的主要犯罪事实是收受677万余元的贿赂。别人的东西不能乱拿，这是在幼儿园时老师就会教的一个朴素的道理，胡长清、成克杰等等贪官的案件相信刘方仁也是如雷贯耳，所以说刘方仁不知道不能收受贿赂、收受贿赂是犯罪，没有人会相信。
想必他不是不知法而是不信法、不敬畏法，不相信法律面前人人平等才是真话。身居省委书记的高位，溜须拍马的多，监督的人少，也许在他看来，法律之剑惩罚的只是那些官位比他低或倒霉的人，并不会指向他。有事例为证，刘方仁在监狱开始了真正的认真学习胡锦涛和温家宝等中央领导的讲话，特别是关于民主法制建设和依法行政的讲话认真保存下来，仔细阅读，并做了很多记号。他说“我以前看报纸，看领导人的讲话，只是把它当作官样文章在浏览，完了就完了，不会认真去想，顶多就是将其中的一些话变成自己作报告时的一些套话，但现在不同了，我认真看过之后，才真正理解了法治对于一个国家的进步有多重要。”原来，他以前并非没学过法，不知道法律，只是没想到法律的锋芒也会指向自己。
然而，他是虽知法但又事实上并没有深刻领悟和感受法的精髓，并不真正懂法。从这一角度上讲，刘方仁的确是个法盲。还是从聘请律师的话题说吧，他当然知道法律赋予了他聘请律师的权利，但他并不清楚，法律之所以要赋予犯罪嫌疑人、被告人聘请律师的权利是因为法律要实现公平与正义，聘请律师才能是让犯罪嫌疑人、被告人更能充分有效地为自己辩护，而这种有效的辩护更能有利于澄清事实，保护人权，也是充分尊重他们的人格，给予表达意见的正当程序。因而，任何聘请律师为自己进行辩护犯罪嫌疑人、被告人都不可能被法庭从重或加重处罚。但是，说到这，我不禁为贵州省的父老乡亲感到后怕，有这么一个把聘请律师等于对抗组织的省委书记，当年他们万一有什么冤屈，还能有效为自己辩护吗？
不过，我更担心的是不知现在还有多少貌是知法却不信法、不敬畏且又不懂法的领导还堂而皇之坐在台上，决定着我们的命运。
通联：江西省赣州市人民检察院 杨涛 华东政法学院法律硕士 邮编：３４１０００
tao1991@163.net
tao9928@tom.com
下载地址: 点击此处下载
中华人民共和国民用航空器适航管理条例(附英文)
中华人民共和国民用航空器适航管理条例(附英文)
1987年5月4日，国务院
第一条 为保障民用航空安全，维护公众利益，促进民用航空事业的发展，特制定本条例。
第二条 在中华人民共和国境内从事民用航空器（含航空发动机和螺旋桨，下同）的设计、生产、使用和维修的单位或者个人，向中华人民共和国出口民用航空器的单位或者个人，以及在中华人民共和国境外维修在中华人民共和国注册登记的民用航空器的单位或者个人，均须遵守本条例。
第三条 民用航空器的适航管理，是根据国家的有关规定，对民用航空器的设计、生产、使用和维修，实施以确保飞行安全为目的的技术鉴定和监督。
第四条 民用航空器的适航管理由中国民用航空局（以下简称民航局）负责。
第五条 民用航空器的适航管理，必须执行规定的适航标准和程序。
第六条 任何单位或者个人设计民用航空器，应当持航空工业部对该设计项目的审核批准文件，向民航局申请型号合格证。民航局接受型号合格证申请后，应当按照规定进行型号合格审定；审定合格的，颁发型号合格证。
第七条 任何单位或者个人生产民用航空器，应当具有必要的生产能力，并应当持本条例第六条规定的型号合格证，经航空工业部同意后，向民航局申请生产许可证。民航局接受生产许可证申请后，应当按照规定进行生产许可审定；审定合格的，颁发生产许可证，并按照规定颁发适航证。
任何单位或者个人未按照前款规定取得生产许可证的，均不得生产民用航空器。但本条例第八条规定的除外。
第八条 任何单位或者个人未取得生产许可证，但因特殊需要，申请生产民用航空器的，须经民航局批准。
按照前款规定生产的民用航空器，须经民航局逐一审查合格后，颁发适航证。
第九条 民用航空器必须具有民航局颁发的适航证，方可飞行。
民航局颁发的适航证应当规定该民用航空器所适用的活动类别、证书的有效期限及安全所需的其他条件和限制。
第十条 持有民用航空器生产许可证的单位生产的民用航空器，经国务院有关主管部门批准需要出口时，由民航局签发出口适航证。
第十一条 在中华人民共和国境内飞行的民用航空器必须具有国籍登记证。在中华人民共和国注册登记的民用航空器，具有中华人民共和国国籍，国籍登记证由民航局颁发。民用航空器取得国籍登记证后，必须按照规定在该民用航空器的外表标明国籍登记识别标志。
第十二条 中华人民共和国的任何单位或者个人进口外国生产的任何型号的民用航空器，如系首次进口并用于民用航空活动时，出口民用航空器的单位或者个人必须向民航局申请型号审查。民航局接受申请后，应当按照规定对该型号民用航空器进行型号审查；审查合格的，颁发准予进口的型号认可证书。
第十三条 中华人民共和国的任何单位或者个人租用的外国民用航空器，必须经民航局对其原登记国颁发的适航证审查认可或者另行颁发适航证后，方可飞行。
第十四条 任何单位或者个人的民用航空器取得适航证以后，必须按照民航局的有关规定和适航指令，使用和维修民用航空器，保证其始终处于持续适航状态。
第十五条 加装或者改装已取得适航证的民用航空器，必须经民航局批准，涉及的重要部件、附件必须经民航局审定。
第十六条 中华人民共和国境内和境外任何维修单位或者个人，承担在中华人民共和国注册登记的民用航空器的维修业务的，必须向民航局申请维修许可证，经民航局对其维修设施、技术人员、质量管理系统审查合格，并颁发维修许可证后，方可从事批准范围内的维修业务活动。
第十七条 负责维修并放行在中华人民共和国注册登记的民用航空器的维修技术人员，必须向民航局提出申请，经民航局或者其授权单位考核合格并取得维修人员执照或者相应的证明文件后，方可从事民用航空器的维修并放行工作。
第十八条 民用航空器的适航审查应当收取费用。收费办法由民航局会同财政部制定。
第十九条 民航局有权对生产、使用、维修民用航空器的单位或者个人以及取得适航证的民用航空器进行定期检查或者抽查；经检查与抽查不合格的，民航局除按照本条例的有关规定对其处罚外，还可吊销其有关证件。
第二十条 使用民用航空器进行飞行活动的任何单位或者个人有下列情形之一的，民航局有权责令其停止飞行，并视情节轻重，处以罚款：
一、民用航空器未取得适航证的；
二、民用航空器适航证已经失效的；
三、使用民用航空器超越适航证规定范围的。
第二十一条 维修民用航空器的单位或者个人，有下列情形之一的，民航局有权责令其停止维修业务或者吊销其维修许可证，并视情节轻重，处以罚款：
一、未取得维修许可证，擅自承接维修业务的；
二、超过维修许可证规定的业务范围，承接维修业务的；
三、由未取得维修人员执照的人员负责民用航空器的维修并放行的。
第二十二条 任何单位或者个人违反本条例第七条规定，擅自生产民用航空器的，民航局有权责令其停止生产，并视情节轻重，处以罚款。
第二十三条 按照本条例受到处罚的单位的上级主管机关，应当根据民航局的建议对受罚单位的主要负责人或者直接责任人员给予行政处分；情节严重，构成犯罪的，由司法机关依法追究刑事责任。
第二十四条 民航局因适航管理工作的过失造成人身伤亡或者重大财产损失的，应当承担赔偿责任，并对直接责任人员给予行政处分；直接责任人员的行为构成犯罪的，由司法机关依追究刑事责任。
第二十五条 民航局从事适航管理的工作人员，利用职务之便营私舞弊的，应当给予行政处分；情节严重，构成犯罪的，由司法机关依法追究刑事责任。
第二十六条 任何单位或者个人对民航局作出的罚款决定不服的，可以在接到罚款通知书之日起十五日内向民航局提请复议，也可以直接向人民法院起诉；期满不提请复议也不起诉又不执行的，民航局可以申请人民法院强制执行。
第二十七条 民航局应当在广泛征求航空工业部及各有关部门意见的基础上，制定本条例的实施细则及有关技术标准。
第二十八条 本条例由民航局负责解释。
第二十九条 本条例自一九八七年六月一日起施行。
REGULATIONS OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA FOR THE ADMINISTRA-TION OF THE AIRWORTHINESS OF CIVIL AIRCRAFT
Important Notice: (注意事项)
英文本源自中华人民共和国务院法制局编译, 中国法制出版社出版的《中华人民
共和国涉外法规汇编》(1991年7月版).
当发生歧意时, 应以法律法规颁布单位发布的中文原文为准.
This English document is coming from the "LAWS AND REGULATIONS OF THE
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA GOVERNING FOREIGN-RELATED MATTERS" (1991.7)
which is compiled by the Brueau of Legislative Affairs of the State
Council of the People's Republic of China, and is published by the China
Legal System Publishing House.
In case of discrepancy, the original version in Chinese shall prevail.
Whole Document (法规全文)
REGULATIONS OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA FOR THE ADMINISTRA-
TION OF THE AIRWORTHINESS OF CIVIL AIRCRAFT
(Promulgated by the State Council on May 4, 1987)
Article 1
These Regulations are formulated for the purpose of ensuring safety in
civil aviation, protecting public interests and promoting the development
of civil aviation undertakings.
Article 2
All units or individuals that are engaged in the designing, manufacturing,
use and maintenance of civil aircraft (including aircraft engines and
propellers, and the same hereinafter) within the People's Republic of
China, all units or individuals that export civil aircraft to the People's
Republic of China, and all units or individuals that perform outside the
People's Republic of China maintenance services to aircraft registered in
the People's Republic of China shall abide by these Regulations.
Article 3
The administration of the airworthiness of civil aircraft denotes the
technical appraisal and supervision exercised in accordance with the
pertinent provisions of the State over the designing, manufacturing, use
and maintenance of civil aircraft for the purpose of ensuring safety in
flight.
Article 4
The Civil Aviation Administration of China (hereinafter referred to as the
"CAAC") shall be responsible for the administration of the airworthiness
of civil aircraft.
Article 5
The administration of the airworthiness of civil aircraft shall be
exercised in accordance with the prescribed airworthiness criteria and
procedures.
Article 6
Any units or individuals that intend to design civil aircraft shall, on
the strength of the document issued by the Ministry of Aeronautic Industry
for the examination and approval of the design project, apply to the CAAC
for a Certificate of Up-to-Standard Model. The CAAC shall, after receipt
of the application therefor, conduct the examination and appraisal, in
accordance with the relevant provisions, as to whether the model to be
designed is up to standard and, if the model is proved to be up to
standard, a Certificate of Up-to-Standard Model shall be issued.
Article 7
Any units or individuals that intend to manufacture civil aircraft shall
have the necessary manufacturing capacity and shall, on the strength of
the Certificate of Up-to-Standard Model as prescribed in Article 6 of
these Regulations and with the consent of the Ministry of Aeronautic
Industry, apply to the CAAC for a Manufacturing Permit. The CAAC shall,
after receipt of the application therefor, conduct examination and
appraisal, in accordance with the relevant provisions, as to whether the
applicants are qualified to obtain a Manufacturing Permit, if they are
proved to be qualified, a Manufacturing Permit shall be issued to them,
together with an Airworthiness Certificate to be issued in accordance with
the relevant provisions.
No units or individuals that have not obtained a Manufacturing Permit in
accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph may manufacture
civil aircraft, except as otherwise prescribed in the provisions of
Article 8 of these Regulations.
Article 8
Any units or individuals that have not obtained a Manufacturing Permit but
intend to manufacture civil aircraft as a result of special needs shall
apply to the CAAC for approval. Civil aircraft manufactured in accordance
with the provision in the preceding paragraph shall be examined one by one
and only after each of them is proved to be up to standard shall an
Airworthiness Certificate be issued.
Article 9
Civil aircraft may engage in flight operations only when they have
possessed an Airworthiness Certificate issued by the CAAC.
The Airworthiness Certificate issued by the CAAC shall specify the type(s)
of activities the aircraft is (are) good for, the period of validity of
the Certificate, and other conditions and restrictions required for
ensuring safety.
Article 10
If civil aircraft manufactured by units possessing a Civil Aircraft
Manufacturing Permit are to be exported as approved by the competent
authorities under the State Council, the Airworthiness Certificate for
Export shall be issued by the CAAC.
Article 11
Civil aircraft that are to fly within the People's Republic of China must
possess Nationality Registration Certificates. Civil aircraft that have
been registered in the People's Republic of China shall bear the
nationality of the People's Republic of China and shall be issued
Nationality Registration Certificate by the CAAC. Civil aircraft shall,
after obtaining a Nationality Registration Certificate, stencil on their
outer surface the identification marks of nationality registration in
accordance with the relevant provisions.
Article 12
Where any units or individuals of the People's Republic of China intend to
import any model of civil aircraft manufactured in foreign countries, and
if it is imported for the first time and to be used for civil aviation
activities, the units or individuals exporting that civil aircraft shall
apply to the CAAC for examination of the model. The CAAC shall, upon
receipt of the application, conduct the examination of the model of the
civil aircraft in accordance with the relevant provisions. If the model is
proved to be up to standard, a Certificate for Model Approval shall be
issued to permit the import.
Article 13
A foreign civil aircraft leased by any unit or individual of the People's
Republic of China may engage in flight operations only after the CAAC has
examined and approved the airworthiness certificate issued by the country
of registry of the said aircraft or only after the CAAC has issued a new
Airworthiness Certificate to the aircraft.
Article 14
Any units or individuals that have obtained Airworthiness Certificates for
their civil aircraft shall, in accordance with the relevant provisions of
the CAAC and its mandates of airworthiness, use and maintain the said
civil aircraft and ensure that they are in a state of permanent
airworthiness.
Article 15
The addition or modification of a civil aircraft for which an
Airworthiness Certificate has been obtained shall be subject to the
approval of the CAAC and the essential components and accessories involved
shall be subject to the examination and approval of the CAAC.
Article 16
Any maintenance units or individuals inside or outside the People's
Republic of China that intend to undertake maintenance services for civil
aircraft registered in the People's Republic of China shall apply to the
CAAC for a Maintenance Permit. Only after the CAAC has examined their
maintenance facilities, technical personnel and quality control system,
found them up to standard and issued a Maintenance Permit may they engage
in the maintenance business activities within the scope approved.
Article 17
Maintenance technical personnel in charge of maintaining and releasing
civil aircraft registered in the People's Republic of China shall apply to
the CAAC and only after the CAAC or a unit authorized by the CAAC has
examined them and found them qualified and they have thus obtained a
Maintenance Personnel Licence or a similar certificate may they engage in
the maintenance and release of civil aircraft.
Article 18
Fees shall be charged for the examination of the airworthiness of a civil
aircraft. The amounts to be charged and relevant procedures for charging
shall be set by the CAAC in conjunction with the Ministry of Finance.
Article 19
The CAAC shall have the right to examine regularly or selectively the
units or individuals that manufacture, use or maintain civil aircraft, as
well as the civil aircraft for which Airworthiness Certificates have been
obtained. If they fail to pass the examination or selective examination,
the CAAC shall impose penalties on them in accordance with the relevant
provisions of these Regulations and may, in addition to that, revoke their
relevant documents.
Article 20
If any units or individuals that use civil aircraft for flight activities
are found in any one of the following circumstances, the CAAC shall have
the right to order them to suspend flight and impose a fine on them in
accordance with the seriousness of the case:
1. no Airworthiness Certificate has been obtained for the civil aircraft;
2. the Airworthiness Certificate of the civil aircraft has expired; or
3. the civil aircraft has been used beyond the scope prescribed in the
Airworthiness Certificate.
Article 21
If any units or individuals that maintain civil aircraft are found in any
of the following circumstances, the CAAC shall have the right to order
them to suspend the maintenance business or revoke their Maintenance
Permit and impose a fine on them in accordance with the seriousness of
case:
1. no Maintenance Permit has been obtained and yet maintenance business
has been procured without authorization;
2. maintenance business has been undertaken beyond the business scope
prescribed in the Maintenance Permit; or
3. personnel who have not obtained a Maintenance Personnel Licence have
been put in charge of the maintenance and release of civil aircraft.
Article 22
If any units or individuals, in violation of the provisions in Article 7
of these Regulations, manufacture civil aircraft without authorization,
the CAAC shall have the right to order them to suspend the manufacturing
and impose a fine on them in accordance with the seriousness of the case.
Article 23
The superior competent authorities in charge of the penalized units in
accordance with these Regulations shall, based on the proposal of the
CAAC, subject the principal persons in charge of the penalized units or
other persons directly responsible to administrative sanctions. If the
case is so serious as to constitute a crime, criminal liabilities shall be
investigated by the judicial organs in accordance with the law.
Article 24
If accidental death or bodily injury or heavy losses in property have
occurred as a result of negligence in the work of airworthiness
administration, the CAAC shall assume the liability for damages and
subject the persons directly responsible to administrative sanctions. If
the act of the persons directly responsible constitutes a crime, the
judicial organs shall investigate their criminal liabilities in accordance
with the law.
Article 25
The CAAC personnel engaged in airworthiness administration who take
advantage of their positions and powers to seek personal gains and graft
and corruption shall be subjected to administrative sanctions. If the case
is so serious as to constitute a crime, criminal liabilities shall be
investigated by the judicial organs in accordance with the law.
Article 26
Any units or individuals that do not accept the decision of the CAAC
concerning the imposition of a fine may, within 15 days of receipt of the
notice of the fine, apply to the CAAC for reconsideration or directly file
a suit with a people's court. If no application for reconsideration is
submitted or no suit is filed and yet the decision has not been executed
at the expiry of the prescribed period of time, the CAAC may apply to the
people's court for the enforcement of the decision.
Article 27
The CAAC shall, on the basis of the opinions widely solicited from the
Ministry of Aeronautic Industry and the various departments concerned,
formulate the rules for the implementation of these Regulations and the
relevant technical standards.
Article 28
The CAAC shall be responsible for the interpretation of these Regulations.
Article 29
These Regulations shall become effective as of June 1, 1987.
最高人民法院关于辽宁省盘锦市兴隆联营公司诉广东省东莞县横流建安公司经销部购销合同货款纠纷一案的管辖问题的批复
最高人民法院关于辽宁省盘锦市兴隆联营公司诉广东省东莞县横流建安公司经销部购销合同货款纠纷一案的管辖问题的批复
1987年6月26日，最高法院
辽宁省高级人民法院：
你院法（经）请〔1987〕1号请示收悉。关于辽宁省盘锦市兴隆联营公司诉广东省东莞县横流建安公司经销部购销合同货款纠纷一案的管辖争议问题，经研究，我院认为：
本案合同的签订地是广东省东莞县，问题在于确定合同的履行地。就001号合同而言，合同规定：绝大部分运费由需方负担，“款到后急发”、“叁季度全部发完”，交货方式实际上是代办托运，发运地为广东省东莞县和广州市。至于在“盘锦站提货”，对于代运情况，不构成特殊约定。因此，该合同的履行地为广东省东莞县和广州市。就002号合同而言，合同虽未指明发运地，但根据全案情况应为兴隆联营公司一方所在地，且货物仍交由运输部门承运，以运单日期为交货日期，故该合同的履行地为辽宁省盘锦市。二月十七日的物资代购对换经济合同只是对前两份合同的变更和完善。
根据本案合同的签订地和履行地的情况，东莞县人民法院和盘锦市中级人民法院对本案均有管辖权。鉴于盘锦市中级人民法院最先收到起诉状并已进行审理，根据《民事诉讼法（试行）》第二十三条、第三十一条和第三十三条第二款的规定，现指定该案由辽宁省盘锦市中级人民法院管辖。
此复
